Author Archives: Henriette Thune

Atle Skaftun new vice director for the Reading Centre, UoS

Nordic Bakhtin Dialogue member Atle Skaftun has recently been employed as vice director for the Reading Centre at the University of Stavanger.  You may read more about the centre in English here, or more extensively in Norwegian here.

-ht

Listen to Atle Skaftun’s book presentation

Atle Skaftun presented his new book at the University of Stavanger recently. A sound recording of the presentation that was held in Norwegian may be found here. The presentation was commented by Professor of literacy studies Bjørn Kvalsvik Nicolaysen.

-ht

Nordic Bakhtinians; dialogue!

Blogging from my cell on the train towards Kristiansand here. Remember that you may send texts to Jan Lundquist, Christian Christiansen or me – Henriette Thune – if you want to share Bakhtin news on this site!

-ht

Bakhtin’s aesthetic object and The Dream Faculty at the University of Agder

Valerie and Cosmogirl - photo Gisle Bjørneby

Valerie and Cosmogirl (photo: Gisle Bjørneby)

Tomorrow I head for Kristiansand where I have been invited to give a seminar about Sara Stridsberg’s The Dream Faculty at the University of Agder Thursday morning. Professor Unni Langås has a group of master students studying canon formation and critique, and they were already scheduled to read The Dream Faculty before I was invited to join them about a month ago.

I am looking very much forward to getting these students not only to discuss The Dream Faculty with me, but also to try out and discuss Bakhtin’s 3 step method for analysis of the aesthetic object put forth in “The Problem of Content, Material and Form in Verbal Art” (ca. 1924). Practically this means that I start out sketching Bakhtin’s method and then let every one of them try to formulate the content of their respective contemplations directed towards The Dream Faculty (step 1), before I present them to mine. Based on this I will present and discuss an overview of my description of the “work in its cognitive givenness”, as Bakhtin formulates it (step 2), the first part of the analysis that is verifiable, and that therefore potentially should be of relevance not only to understanding my immediate experience of the work, but also to substantiating the students’ experiences. Ultimately the students will be doing an hour of group work, where I intend to ask them to try to link the content of their respective contemplations to the description of the work in its cognitive givenness (step 3).

To problematize the idea of form shaping ideology (or perhaps more specifically ideology shaping form?) I will put The Dream Faculty in perspective, introducing my reading of the Norwegian theatre adaptation of The Dream Faculty: Valerie Jean Solanas will be president of America (National Theatre Torshov, 2009). I argue that although the theatre play resembles the novel at several key points on the surface (character constellations, story, style, courses of events), the two aesthetic objects produce very different meaning.  By analysis I argue that this discrepancy is not primarily result of media specific differences, but instead displays aesthetic form mirroring context and ideological choices (about transportation of transmedial phenomenons or not) made by the artists involved in the adaptation process (for instance translator, director, adapter, actors).

Bakhtin’s aesthetic object consists of aesthetics, ethics and epistemology intertwined, and might therefore inform us on the relation between (aesthetic) form and (ethical-epistemological) ideology.

-ht

Being Together

As some of you know, I am working on a PhD thesis in the intersection between Bakthin, aesthetics, feminist theory and gender studies.  February 18th and 19th 2010 I went to an exchange seminar between the gender studies’ culture  research group at the University of Stavanger that I am part of,  and the research group Being  Together at the Centre for Gender Research at the University of Oslo.  The common denominator of the seminar (apart from the subjects treated) was Wencke Mühleisen who is leader of Network of Gender Studies at the University of Stavanger, co-advisor of my PhD thesis (next to main advisor Atle Skaftun), and together with Jørgen Lorentzen project leader of the Norwegian Research Council-financed project Being Together – Remaking Public Intimacies. It was a fruitful meeting between several  projects that were all tangent to one another, in one or another way.

My main contribution to the seminar was to present part of my adaptation analysis of Sara Stridsberg’s The Dream Faculty to the theatre piece Valerie Jean Solanas shall be president of  America, using (not surprisingly) Bakhtin’s concept of the aesthetic object from “The Problem of Material, Content and Form in Verbal Art” (PCMF, ca. 1924) as my starting point. I got a lot of relevant comments – the most interesting, perhaps, a claim that I would have to treat point one of Bakhtin’s three stage model of analysis from PCMF – my description of the content of my contemplation directed towards the aesthetic object – as new produced empirical data on the same level as the novel text and the theatre manuscript, and not primarily as part of my analytical reflection, since it is not verifiable. I am still (and will continue to be) reflecting over that. Comments from any of you will be very welcome!

Me being quite comfortable with the label Bakhtinan feminist, I am also excited about an interest for and initiative from a group of PhD and post doc scholars (also beyond the Being Together group) at the Centre of Gender Research at the University of Oslo to start a reading group on Bakhtin. I am happy to have been invited to be part of the group and will keep you posted as the reading starts.

-ht

Jørgen Bruhn and Sigurd Kværndrup in Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality

Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality

Following the 2007 conference Imagine Media! at the University of Växjö, now Linnaeus University Växjö, the conference publication Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality (ed. Lars Elleström) is available as of today (follow the link to order your copy!) Nordic Bakhtin Dialogue members Jørgen Bruhn and Sigurd Kværndrup, both belonging to the Linnaeus University Växjö, have articles in the publication:

Introduction: L.Elleström
PART I: MEDIA, MODALITIES, AND MODES
The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations; L.Elleström
PART II: MEDIA BORDERS OF QUALIFIED MEDIA
Border Talks: The Problematic Status of Media Borders in the Current Debate about Intermediality; I.Rajewsky
Intermedial Topography and Metaphorical Interaction; A.Englund
Intermedial Strategies in Multimedia Art; C.Ljungberg
PART III: COMBINATIONS AND INTEGRATIONS OF MEDIA
‘Media’ before ‘Media’ Were Invented: The Medieval Ballad and the Romanesque Church; S.Kværndrup
The Intermediality of Field Guides: Notes Towards a Theory; H.Sandgren
Media on the Edge of Nothingness: Visual Apostrophes in Lettrism; S.Sjöberg
PART IV: MEDIATIONS AND TRANSFORMATIONS OF MEDIA
Penrose, ‘Seeing is Believing’: Intentionality, Mediation, and Comprehension in the Arts; S.Bruhn
Beyond Definition: A Pragmatic Approach to Intermediality; V.Robillard
Translating Sounds: Intermedial Exchanges in Amy Lowell’s ‘Stravinsky’s Three Pieces “Grotesques” for String Quartet’; R.Schober
‘Transgenic Art’: The Biopoetry of Eduardo Kac; C.Clüver
Photo/graphic Traces in Dubravka Ugresic’s The Museum of Unconditional Surrender; K.Sándor
The Dance of Intermediality: Attempt to a Semiotic Approach of Medium Specificity and Intermediality in Film; H.Király
Media in the Cinematic Imagination: Ekphrasis and the Poetics of the In-Between in Jean-Luc Godard’s Cinema; A.Pethő
PART V: THE BORDERS OF MEDIA BORDERS
Heteromediality; J.Bruhn
Intermediality Re-Visited: Some Reflections about Basic Principles of this Axe de pertinence; J.E.Müller
Notes
Bibliography
Index

-ht

Research tweets

For a couple of months now I’ve been trying to cultivate tweeting for the purpose of ‘researchers being present in social media’  (particularly since I am not like a lot of you others on for instance Facebook). There hasn’t been an awful lot of activity, but enough to motivate me to try it out further 😉 There is contact from other Bakhtin researchers world-wide, people who get guided to this blog, and perhaps particularly the possibility of posing questions or picking up and answering requests and questions to and from other people who work on Bakhtin or other coinciding subjects. The twitter universe works fast and responses come quickly.

You may check it out here: http://www.twitter.com and you find me here: http://twitter.com/henriettethune

-ht